| Scarlet (Little Upsilon) | Thursday, January 20, 2011 - 08:07 am 
I daresay that the time has come to forgo the cumbersome and beclouded speech of loanwords borrowed from sundry wordsets of outlander stock and begin the work of forswearing Greek- and Latin-drawn words thus paying greater heed to those Anglo-Saxon-drawn words. As a means to begin such a shift in the wordset, I have chosen to go overboard to draw a sampling of what such a shift would need. However, I am only one man with weird thoughts afloat in the great sea of many folks' thoughts, drowned out by iffiness, half-mindedness, and mistrust. One can and ought to ask, "Why work to awaken these words? What makes this gainsome hunt seem worthwhile?" Truly, the answer is simply because many folk mindlessly overuse, undertaking to seem deep, not just loanwords drawn from Greek and Latin but, rather, whole wordgroups wrapping in these loanwords with no knowledge as to what they truly mean. |
| Jannuar (Fearless Blue) | Thursday, January 20, 2011 - 11:14 am
verbum sat sapienti |
| Parsifal (Kebir Blue) | Thursday, January 20, 2011 - 02:49 pm
well bro, you've pickeled my interest. |
| Scarlet (Golden Rainbow) | Thursday, January 20, 2011 - 09:43 pm
To speak truthfully, I must avow that the wielding of Anglo-Saxon drawn words is a bit burdensome and that one needs to think over and look up the roots of every word before spelling it out. Don't even get me started on the many words that can't even be wielded toward simple wordsharing and the many words that must be crafted together. It has been almost a thousand years since this kind of wordset has even been wielded alone. If wielded sparingly and willfully, Anglo-Saxon drawn words commonly lack the beclouded flashiness of outlander wordsets. This is the underlying draw of these homely words. However, I am just throwing away some spare time more than working to make an overthreading point. |
| Scarlet (Golden Rainbow) | Thursday, January 20, 2011 - 10:09 pm
(Not limited to Anglo-Saxon words.) In effect, I'm really just saying that its better to not bother trying to appear sophisticated by using Latin- and Greek-derived words. If you want a revealing play on words, 'most attempts at the appearance of sophistication are mere sophistry' and hide the meaning of the actual language. "Eschew obfuscation, espouse elucidation" is the motto . . . which would mean when applied: Avoid being unclear, promote clearness.
However, I will mention that Anglo-Saxon roots do offer plenty of interesting words like sundry, winsome, reckoning, gainsaying, etc. All of which have their usefulness. As a vocabulary-building exercise, this is proving to be very useful. |
| Border C | Friday, January 21, 2011 - 12:09 am
OMG! Did CraftyCockney haxor your account too??? |
| Laguna | Friday, January 21, 2011 - 01:47 am
Simple escaped you. |
| Accordion_This (Little Upsilon) | Friday, January 21, 2011 - 02:05 am
I completely disagree, Scarlet. I personally think we should return to the mother language, "Leet Speak".
4|\||) 7|-|3|\| \/\/3'|_|_ |^\/\/|\| 7|-|0$3 817<|-|3$. |
| Jannuar (Fearless Blue) | Friday, January 21, 2011 - 06:38 am
01001001 00100000 01100001 01100111 01110010 01100101 01100101 00101100 00100000 01101100 01100101 01110100 01110011 00100000 01110101 01110011 01100101 00100000 01000010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 |
| Scarlet (Little Upsilon) | Friday, January 21, 2011 - 05:26 pm
Quote:Simple escaped you.
In my own wardship, I'm not flawless, but I hope that I didn't let anything else leak through. Driving on, I don't believe Leet Speak or Binary bear any buildsome end toward talking. Haha, I like how swapping communication with talking made the saying look self-enlightening. |
| hymy1 (Kebir Blue) | Saturday, January 22, 2011 - 02:50 am
YmFzZTY0IGlzIGFwcGFyZW50bHkgbW9yZSBlZmZpY2llbnQgdGhhbiBiaW5hcnksIHNvIHdlIHNob3VsZCByZWFsbHkgdXNlIGl0Lg==
01100010 01100001 01110011 01100101 00110110 00110100 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 01110000 01110000 01100001 01110010 01100101 01101110 01110100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100101 01100110 01100110 01101001 01100011 01101001 01100101 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01101110 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00101100 00100000 01110011 01101111 00100000 01110111 01100101 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101111 01110101 01101100 01100100 00100000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01101100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01110101 01110011 01100101 00100000 01101001 01110100 00101110 |
| Scarlet (Golden Rainbow) | Saturday, January 22, 2011 - 03:53 am
The main thing to think about is that both binary and base64 are ways of beshrouding an already forebeing tongue. Without knowledge of the thus beshrouded tongue or the key for unbeshrouding, the aforespoken tongues show themselves as nothing but gibberish. As such, these cannot be deemed as tongues at all. This is ground enough to slight both in upholding the main thought of talking over true tongues. |
| Laguna | Saturday, January 22, 2011 - 03:07 pm
Italics... smart move.
So, what's your stance on aforsaken?
Edit: It appears you edited it. Afore is a different matter. |
| Scarlet (Golden Rainbow) | Saturday, January 22, 2011 - 11:35 pm
What do you mean?
Afore- is a forepart of a word meaning 'before' making aforespoken into 'spoken before' or further 'in that which was earlier spoken of'. Aforespoken came about by working to swap out aforementioned with an Anglo-Saxon root. The a- here is not wielded with the meaning of the Greek a- (not), but in the Anglo-Saxon meaning (in, toward, at, on, to).
I can't call back to mind writing aforsaken, but for- is not the same thing as fore-. Heeding the meanings of each, one is wielded in the thoughts behind "forbid, forswear, and forgo", and the other is wielded in the thoughts behind "foresee, forenoon, and foretell". With for- words, putting a- before the for- has no true meaning as far as I know since their meanings seem to undo each other. |
| Laguna | Sunday, January 23, 2011 - 01:30 am
I noticed that, that's why I edited the post to say "afore" is a different matter.
I have no idea why I read aforsaken. And yes, it doesn't come any sense from it. |
| Scarlet (Kebir Blue) | Thursday, January 27, 2011 - 06:27 am
Haha, the name of my band of players could be roughly shifted to Freestander Upholding Kithship. |
